|
|
|
ROBERT
CRAIS: PIKE'S WAY
The Man Behind the Sunglasses
by
Robert Crais
The
sunglasses, twenty-four/seven. The
eerie silence. The red arrows
driving him forward.
Ladies and gentlemen, I give you Joe
Pike.
Tens of thousands of women (and more than a few men)
would happily take him.
I don’t need to be a mind reader to know this. Like
Elvis Cole, Joe had always gotten a
lot of mail, but a tsunami of email
flooded my website when The
Watchman was published. They
wrote, “I love Joe Pike,” but not in
a way suggesting they were simply
fond of him or maybe kinda crushing
on him. Both then and now, the women
who write to Joe are feral.
They say, “I WANT Joe Pike.”
Which means, because it’s oh so easy to infer their
dripping fangs and pheromone fog
even through the filter of internet
fan mail, “I’d suck the marrow
from his bones.”
I first saw Joe Pike at the Florida Drive-In Theater in
Baton Rouge, Louisiana. Would have
been one of those triple bills
Southern drive-ins are famous for. I
would have been a kid, snuck across
the marshy fields to slip between
rows of sleeping cars, the cars
wired to speaker trees like tethered
cattle. The darkness was my friend,
masking my entrance to that
wonderful old theater.
I remembered him years later when I created the
characters and story that would
become The Monkey's Raincoat. Gun
fighter eyes in a face burned dark
by the sun; his eyes as cold as an
empty heart. Humorless lips. Your
worst nightmare if he paints you
with his rattlesnake gaze. Clint
Eastwood. A Fistful of Dollars.
For a Few Dollars More.
The Good, the Bad, the Ugly.
A walking can of whup ass. I could
have left it there but I never leave
well-enough alone.
Mr. Eastwood, the God-Priest of Manliness back in the
day, was not the
flash-image inspiration for Joe Pike
- he was what I saw when I first
imagined Elvis Cole. In those first
days of Elvis’s birth, I envisioned
him as the stereotypical loner, and
my first notions were arch clichés.
Cole listened to moody jazz. He had
a Hollywood apartment overlooking a
neon sign. He smoked, liked cheap
bourbon, and was big on sipping the
bourbon while watching the neon sign
through clouds of smoke. Yawn. When
I came to my senses I dropped the
nonsense and created the character
you know as Elvis Cole.
But even as I developed Cole, I knew I wanted him to
have a friend. Butch and Sundance.
Batman and Robin. Lucky Jack Aubrey
and Stephen Maturin. Thelma and
Louise. Before I wrote The
Monkey's Raincoat, I wrote a lot of
television and watched even more.
Cagney & Lacey, Miami Vice with
Crockett and Tubbs. These
friendships inspired me both as a
reader and writer. Cole was not
going to be part of a formal
organization like the police - I
identified more with an outsider who
did not have the authority that
comes with the badge - but I also
had no interest in writing about a
character so disaffected he was
absent of friends. Elvis Cole needed
a friend. Note that I am using the
word ‘friend,’ and not ‘partner.’
The human stuff of friendship was
important in all of this.
The afterthought image of the nameless man returned but
again quickly changed. The narrowed
eyes and sharp-cut jaw evolved
within Elvis Cole’s house in the
hills into someone much more
compelling. I was once aboard ship
in the South Pacific where the water
was 17,000 feet deep. Water that
deep grows dark as it swallows the
light. It is bottomless. When you
see a shadow move in the depths, the
hair will stand up on the back of
your neck. You know all the way down
in your DNA that something terrible
swims in those waters. I was drawn
to it. Out there at sea, I leaned
across the rail again and again,
trying to see into the depths. I
still do, only now the water is
Pike.
For an article like this, I find it easier to describe
Elvis Cole than Joe Pike. Armchair
psychologists will no doubt pipe up
that this is because I identify more
with Cole, or that he is my alter
ego (he isn’t), but I think it is
less a factor of identification than
with understanding. Pike is an
iceberg, and I am trying to
understand the parts of him beneath
the water. Careless swimmers have
disturbed the silt. The waters are
murky; the shadows indistinct and
shifting; the darkness increases as
the water deepens, and Joe Pike
lives in the depths.
Listen. I wanted the fun and kick-ass good time of this
enigmatic character - Joe’s
now-famous twitch is there for you
to enjoy - but Pike and Cole were
always more. My fiction is about
underdogs. And because I want there
to be justice in this world,
underdogs must have heroes or they
must become heroes. The more I
thought about Elvis Cole, and how he
came to be Elvis, it occurred to me
he could have taken another road
that would have led him to becoming
someone like Pike. Elvis has chosen
to engage life; Pike, in many ways,
has stepped outside of it. Somewhere
in his past, he became ‘other.’
Once upon a time for what was, I guess, advertising
purposes, a publisher dubbed Joe
Pike a ‘sociopath.’ He isn’t. I once
thought of Elvis and Joe as a kind
of yin and yang, a view that has
been echoed by more than a few
readers and reviewers. They are not.
Nor is Pike simply Elvis Cole’s
assassin; a guilty-pleasure author’s
device for getting Cole out of the
morally queasy sidewaters of
dropping the hammer on bad guys
without benefit of judge, jury,
constitutional protections, or
hand-wringing after-action remorse.
Pike is Pike. Like Elvis Cole, he is
the underdog who has turned himself
into a hero.
My books are about self-creation. I’m big on that. You
can either be the victim of your
past, or rise above it. Either way,
the choice is yours. Both Elvis and
Joe have chosen to change, but
having changed isn’t a done deal,
over and out, now-I-can-relax kind
of thing. Having changed, you have
to maintain because that whole
‘self-creation’ business, well, it’s
an ongoing process.
And therein lies both their
difference and their sameness. Check
it out.
Their example is the example of choices made. Cole
doggedly embraces the ‘normal,’ and
cultivates those parts of himself
that resist the darkness of his own
experience - the Disney icons, the
science fiction films he enjoyed as
a boy, the relaxed and comfortable
attire (Hawaiian shirts and
sneakers), the self-effacing sense
of humor. These are the proud
standards telling you this man is
living life on his own terms. His
very job - private investigator -
tells you he holds himself apart.
Cole is the product of these
lifestyle choices, and would be a
great guy to have a beer with or
catch a Dodgers game.
Joe Pike is a conscious representative of our righteous
rage. The product of abusive
childhood violence, Pike learned
early that if you want justice, you
must look to yourself. An only child
living with his mother and a
violent, alcoholic father at the
edge of a small town, Pike and his
mother suffered regular beatings by
his father. Society did not save Joe
- not the police, friends, or
neighbors. No Eastwood-like hero
rode into town to save Mrs. Pike and
her young son, so Joe learned his
father’s lesson well. You deal with
a bully by an overwhelming physical
response. Presented with a threat,
you confront it. Pike’s philosophy
was boiled to its primal base:
Dominate or be dominated. Pike set
about preparing himself to control
his environment, and does. He buried
his pain so deep he could
pretend it was gone, and removed
himself from normal life.
The seed of this was the rage he felt at his own
helplessness, I think, but Pike’s
rage is not mindless. He knows some
part of himself was lost in the
process, and has spent much of his
adult life learning to deal with his
‘otherness.’ To think he is mindless
- floating in the dark waters like
his namesake fish, all cortical
activity and no forebrain - would be
a mistake.
Though I know many things about Pike, he is still a
mystery. When Pike is within
himself and seemingly disconnected
from his surroundings, he has pulled
back from the outer world to a place
I describe as ‘the green world’ - a
primal world where he feels safe.
It’s as if Pike has submerged,
settling into a temporary moment of
transcendental calm like a zen
warrior at the eye of a storm,
divorced from the chaos around him,
but at peace with it. The
green world represents the safety of
the forest where he hid from his
father, but the green world also
represents the primitive nature of
Pike’s character. We
can’t see his thoughts in that green
world, and might not understand them
even if we could, but we are one
with and part of that nature. After
all, we are part of the natural
world, too. We are the animals in
the forest whether that forest is a
leafy green glade or the sprawling
city of Los Angeles. Our animal
natures are revealed in either
place.
Pike would probably tell you, if he thought it was
worth spending the breath, that he
has accepted the responsibility for
his own security. Pike doesn’t give
a lot of due to what we call ‘black
letter law.’ Pike has a very strict
moral and ethical code, but it is a
code independent of the statutes of
written law.
When Larkin Conner Barkley asks him, in The Watchman,
whether he feels remorse at having
killed men, Pike is able to answer
without hesitation.
“No.”
He doesn’t. If a man threatens you, you put him down.
It is the natural order. No sense
worrying about it, so he doesn’t.
How Pike sees the world is part of
his mystery. His lack of emotion
suggests an inner landscape so
damaged it is as barren as the
desert surrounding Tikrit. It also
suggests an emptiness waiting to be
filled, and therein lies Pike’s
tragic nature, and, I suspect, the
sexy-hot core of his huge appeal.
(It is not lost on me that the young
male heartthrobs in the current crop
of insanely successful vampire
novels and films are all brooding
bad-boy vamp loners – held in check
from their evil ways only by the
love of a good woman, who is herself
moved by their tortured hearts. Has
any vampire been as lethal as Joe
Pike, or as tortured?)
Pike is the ultimate bad boy. He is dangerous,
enigmatic, and an outsider. He is
male with a capital M, but it is his
tragic soul that makes him sexy with
a capital S. Readers intuit that he
is redeemable, or, at least,
repairable, and – you know what? –
their read is true. If the readers
who lust after Joe do so because
they feel they can fill the empty
place within him, or heal the hurt
of his damaged heart, then maybe
they can. After all, though Pike’s
inner landscape might be barren, he
recognizes that Cole’s inner
landscape is teeming with life, and
wishes his own were as fertile. He
wants to heal. This desire probably
defines the specialness of their
friendship.
This struggle is the stuff of heroes. These books are
heroic fiction with liberal doses of
myth and adventure, but I hope they
are more than escapist fantasy (even
for the legions of readers who send
mash notes to Pike, care of me).
Though these are crime novels, the
‘crime novel’ is simply the canvas
upon which I have chosen to paint,
and my subject matter, I hope, is
larger than gunfighting and
high-velocity action sequences
(though these things are certainly
part of my books and I want you to
enjoy them!). I write about people.
My thrill of accomplishment doesn’t
come from the blind-side plot twist,
but from that nuance of character
that touches you, moves you, and, I
hope, surprises you not with the ‘aha!’
of an unexpected plot reveal, but
with the surprising resonance of
human understanding.
At the end of the proverbial day, Joe Pike might be
sexy, but I also want him to be a
fully realized human being. I think
he is. My readers agree, and I love
it.
|
|